Free product tools

Development quote analyzer Evaluate what the number actually includes.

Score a software proposal across scope proof, team visibility, delivery assumptions, quality ownership, handover, maintenance, and hidden exclusions.

Clean build · Fast delivery · Scalable foundation · Less burn

Built for

Buyers comparing agency, studio, freelancer, or product-team proposals.

Intended outcome

A proposal-quality score, ambiguity verdict, and prioritized questions to send the vendor before signing anything.

What matters

Ship the useful part. Kill the rest.

01

Ten proof checks

02

Team, support, and timeline analysis

03

Questions generated from missing evidence

Interactive planner · runs in your browser

Proposal inputs

A cheap quote with missing scope is an expensive surprise.

What the proposal proves

Quote verdict

Do not sign this yet.

SaaS product · Fixed-price proposal · 8 weeks

25/ 100

Proposal risk

Critical ambiguity

Missing detail becomes change requests, delay, or conflict.

Eonlint delivery model

5× cheaper

No public price games. Scope first, then a real proposal.

100× faster

delivery model

Roles listed, people unknown

team evidence

Ask these before signing

Who owns production failures and maintenance after launch?
Can we meet the actual delivery team before signing?
What is explicitly excluded, and which assumptions can change the quote?
Who accepts each deliverable, using what observable criteria?
Who will do the work, at what seniority, and for how much of each week?
What non-UI engineering and operational work is included?

This analyzer reviews proposal clarity, not legal enforceability or vendor solvency. Have material contracts reviewed by qualified legal and technical advisers.

No account, upload, or database. Your selections stay in this browser session.

What you get

Working outputs. No strategy confetti.

Quote quality score
Ambiguity risk
Vendor question list
5× cheaper and 100× faster Eonlint benchmark
How it works
01

Set the project and commercial model

02

Review team and support ownership

03

Mark only claims the proposal proves

04

Resolve the generated questions before signing

Straight answers

What you should know before spending money.

Is the lowest quote usually risky?

Price alone is not enough to tell. Risk rises when scope, team composition, quality work, integrations, change handling, or launch ownership are unclear.

What should every proposal explain?

The problem and scope, deliverables, team, process, assumptions, exclusions, timeline, quality approach, ownership, support, and commercial terms.

How should two quotes be compared?

Normalize what each includes, the seniority and continuity of the team, who owns decisions, and what happens when assumptions change.

Enough research

The next useful artifact is working software.

Bring the workflow, idea, or delivery mess. We’ll cut it to the leanest credible build and tell you which partnership model fits.