Product resources

MVP scope template Draw a hard line around first value.

A scope framework for separating the essential learning workflow from attractive but non-critical features.

Clean build · Fast delivery · Scalable foundation · Less burn

Built for

Teams turning a broad product idea into a first credible release.

Intended outcome

A smaller, more defensible MVP with explicit assumptions, exclusions, and a plan for what the release must teach.

What matters

Ship the useful part. Kill the rest.

01

Core learning objective

02

Must-have workflow

03

Explicit later list

What you get

Working outputs. No strategy confetti.

MVP hypothesis
Target user and situation
Critical path
Must-have capabilities
Excluded capabilities
Launch evidence and decision rules
How it works
01

Name the most expensive assumption

02

Define the smallest complete journey

03

Challenge every supporting feature

04

Tie launch metrics to the next decision

Two ways to work

Pay for the build.
Or bet with us.

Most founders bring a monthly budget and hire us to deliver. A few bring a vision strong enough for us to join the bet. Both models stay lean, direct, and accountable.

MODEL 01

Build + maintain

One monthly budget.
We ship and maintain.

You set the cash ceiling. We cut the scope to fit, ship working software every week, launch it, and keep it healthy. No hourly mystery. No hostage code.

  • Predictable monthly spend
  • Weekly working releases
  • Launch ownership
  • Ongoing maintenance
Get a build plan
MODEL 02

Virtual CTO partnership

Small retainer.
Shared equity. Long game.

For a small number of serious, long-horizon products, we join as the technical partner: roadmap, architecture, hiring, delivery, and scale. Lower cash. Real equity. Shared upside.

  • Virtual CTO ownership
  • Lean monthly cash
  • Aligned equity stake
  • Selective partnerships only
Pitch the vision
Straight answers

What you should know before spending money.

How many features should an MVP have?

There is no useful universal number. It needs the smallest complete experience that can test the core assumption with the intended user.

Should admin tools be included?

Include the minimum operational tooling needed to deliver safely and learn. Manual operations can be reasonable when volume is controlled and the process is visible.

What if stakeholders disagree on scope?

Return to the learning objective, user journey, risk, and launch constraint. Preferences become easier to resolve against explicit decision criteria.

Enough research

The next useful artifact is working software.

Bring the workflow, idea, or delivery mess. We’ll cut it to the leanest credible build and tell you which partnership model fits.